Law Firm News
Today's Date: Bookmark This Website
Pennsylvania GOP take gerrymandering case to US high court
Court Issues | 2018/01/29 01:17
state's highest court in a gerrymandering case brought by Democrats that threw out the boundaries of its 18 congressional districts and ordered them redrawn within three weeks.

Republicans who control Pennsylvania's Legislature wrote that state Supreme Court justices unconstitutionally usurped the authority of lawmakers to create congressional districts and they asked the nation's high court to put the decision on hold while it considers their claims.

The 22-page argument acknowledged that "judicial activism" by a state supreme court is ordinarily beyond the U.S. Supreme Court's purview. But, it said, "the question of what does and does not constitute a 'legislative function' under the Elections Clause is a question of federal, not state, law, and this Court is the arbiter of that distinction."

Justice Samuel Alito, who handles emergency appeals from Pennsylvania, could ask the registered Democratic voters on the other side of the case to respond. Alito could act on his own, though the full court generally gets involved in cases involving elections. An order could come in a matter of days, although there is no deadline for the justices to act.

Pennsylvania's congressional districts are criticized as among the nation's most gerrymandered. Its case is happening amid a national tide of gerrymandering cases from various states, including some already under consideration by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Election law scholars call the Republicans' request for the U.S. Supreme Court's intervention a long shot.

They say they know of no other state court decision throwing out a congressional map because of partisan gerrymandering, and the nation's high court has never struck down an electoral map as a partisan gerrymander.

[PREV] [1] ..[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34].. [1680] [NEXT]
Legal Network
Law Firm News
Court Issues
Court Watch
Legal Interview
Blog News
Press Release
Legal Opinions
TransCanada doesn't have to ..
Former Trump campaign aide N..
Martin Shkreli cries in cour..
Cambodian court denies oppos..
South Carolina court questio..
Court rules in favor of fire..
Brazil court largely upholds..
Supreme Court declines to ta..
Organized labor case goes in..
High court: Held immigrants ..
Court: Nike logo of Michael ..
Court leaves black judge on ..
Court: US anti-discriminatio..
Catalan politicians in Spani..
Courts: Bail reform working,..

   Lawyer & Law Firm Websites
Chicago Business Law Attorney
Corporate Litigation Attorneys
Canton Criminal Lawyer
Canton DUI lawyer
Criminal Defense Website Designs
DUI Law Website Development
Surry County Criminal Defense Lawyers
Yadkin County Family Law Attorneys
Car Accidents Attorneys
New Rochelle Personal Injury
Oregon DUI Law Attorney
Eugene DUI Lawyer. Criminal Defense Law
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
San Francisco Trademark Lawyer
San Francisco Copyright Lawyer
Chicago Work Accident Lawyer
Chicago Workplace Injury Attorneys
Philadelphia Employment Lawyer
Attorney Marc E. Weinstein
Santa Ana Workers' Compensation Lawyers
Houston Car Accident Attorneys
Wrongful Death Attorneys Houston
Houston Wrongful Death
New York Adoption Lawyers
New York Foster Care Lawyers
Adoption Pre-Certification
   Legal Resource Links
  U.S. Legal News
© Law Firm News Network. All rights reserved.

The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Law Firm News Network as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. Legal Blog postings and hosted comments are available for general educational purposes only and should not be used to assess a specific legal situation. Law Firm Web Design by Law Promo