Law Firm News
Today's Date: Bookmark This Website
Pennsylvania court throws out congressional boundaries
Court Issues | 2018/01/18 01:14
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court struck down the state's widely criticized congressional map Monday, granting a major victory to Democrats who alleged the 18 districts were unconstitutionally gerrymandered to benefit Republicans and setting off a scramble to draw a new map.

In the Democratic-controlled court's decision, the majority said the boundaries "clearly, plainly and palpably" violate the state's constitution and blocked the boundaries from remaining in effect for the 2018 elections with just weeks until dozens of people file paperwork to run for Congress.

The justices gave the Republican-controlled Legislature until Feb. 9 to pass a replacement and Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf until Feb. 15 to submit it to the court. Otherwise, the justices said they will adopt a plan in an effort to keep the May 15 primary election on track.

The decision comes amid a national tide of gerrymandering cases, including some that have reached the U.S. Supreme Court.

Democrats cheered the decision to toss out a Republican-drawn map used in three general elections going back to 2012. The map, they say, gave Republicans crucial help in securing 13 of 18 seats in a state where registered Democratic voters outnumber Republicans 5 to 4.

"We won the whole thing," said David Gersch of the Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer law firm in Washington, D.C., which is helping represent the group of registered Democrats who filed the lawsuit last June.

The defendants — top Republican lawmakers — said they would ask the U.S. Supreme Court this week to step in and put the decision on hold. The state court's decision lacks clarity, precedent and respect for the constitution and would introduce chaos into the state's congressional races, they said.

The Senate's top Republican lawyer, Drew Crompton, called the timeline to draw new districts "borderline unworkable," but said Republicans will do everything they can to comply.

[PREV] [1] ..[34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42].. [1680] [NEXT]
Legal Network
Law Firm News
Court Issues
Court Watch
Legal Interview
Blog News
Press Release
Legal Opinions
TransCanada doesn't have to ..
Former Trump campaign aide N..
Martin Shkreli cries in cour..
Cambodian court denies oppos..
South Carolina court questio..
Court rules in favor of fire..
Brazil court largely upholds..
Supreme Court declines to ta..
Organized labor case goes in..
High court: Held immigrants ..
Court: Nike logo of Michael ..
Court leaves black judge on ..
Court: US anti-discriminatio..
Catalan politicians in Spani..
Courts: Bail reform working,..

   Lawyer & Law Firm Websites
Chicago Business Law Attorney
Corporate Litigation Attorneys
Canton Criminal Lawyer
Canton DUI lawyer
Criminal Defense Website Designs
DUI Law Website Development
Surry County Criminal Defense Lawyers
Yadkin County Family Law Attorneys
Car Accidents Attorneys
New Rochelle Personal Injury
Oregon DUI Law Attorney
Eugene DUI Lawyer. Criminal Defense Law
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
San Francisco Trademark Lawyer
San Francisco Copyright Lawyer
Chicago Work Accident Lawyer
Chicago Workplace Injury Attorneys
Philadelphia Employment Lawyer
Attorney Marc E. Weinstein
Santa Ana Workers' Compensation Lawyers
Houston Car Accident Attorneys
Wrongful Death Attorneys Houston
Houston Wrongful Death
New York Adoption Lawyers
New York Foster Care Lawyers
Adoption Pre-Certification
   Legal Resource Links
  U.S. Legal News
© Law Firm News Network. All rights reserved.

The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Law Firm News Network as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. Legal Blog postings and hosted comments are available for general educational purposes only and should not be used to assess a specific legal situation. Law Firm Web Design by Law Promo